In Mastodon, @akshay from social.coop TWG (Tech Working Group) posted:
On first look the tech stuff doesn’t look too complex to host. My gut-feel is that people in TWG have the required skills to run BBB and even adopt code published by meet.coop.
However, I would like to see how we can solve some of the challenges faced by meet.coop. Currently I have no ideas for that, perhaps we can have a little discussion about it sometime next week?
@mikemh responded:
Great 
In the next couple of days I plan to make a presentation (in BBB - it has special features!) for the community of comradely coops we’re now in conversation with. Hoping to outline a range of issues that it would be great to resolve.
Rather than a new parent for BBB, i suspect we need a platform coop federation, provisioning an ecosystem of tools under commons stewardship. Across regions & member communities. Different coops = different elements in ‘a stack of commons’.
I failed to get this down yesterday and thursday, will make another attempt today. A bit chewy! Fingers crossed! i’ll announce in Mastodon and Discourse when I have a recording to view. Then - all jump into the forum, I hope! Plus video chats? The clock is ticking.
Currently the discussion potentially is with CommonsCloud @dvdjaco , social.coop @mnoyes @edsu @akshay @EduMerco MayFirst @jamie @Jaime @EduMerco , WebTV (Montreal) @gcotnoir @otisyves , Collocall @hng , Agaric/CommunityBridge @freescholar and collective.tools/OpenCoop @petter @osb . Would be great to bring in other European and multilingual coops. @jnardi @fredsultan