I would like this we to be a formal vote here because we are essentially voting ourselves in to bootstrap. Also when we voted to add Collocall at an all hands, @wouter claimed that he would’ve preferred that these membership additions be voted formally on the forum.
This is not voting on the criteria, but the actual list of members. The criteria was formerly voted in here. I understand the wiki contains a modified version @wouter posted, and in the thread I disagreed with the process it was modified and think we need to formally vote in those amendments, €500 vs. €1000, but that’s an aside.
I have a link to a previous decision on the criteria, there is a clear record trail. I don’t expect to reproduce the entire text here.
We need to designate a place for final and current records. That place is the wiki. Forum threads contain in-progress terms (e.g. Producer, Permanent Assembly) and is a point of confusion.
-
This is why it’s especially important to not modify text when we move final agreed text to wiki, because then it defeats the whole purpose of our consent process.
-
I have made a point about using consistent and exact words across spaces, and have been going into our tools to update outdated references (e.g. you will see Producers text is now Operational Members). This is a futile feat if we don’t collective adopt this practice.
We can call it either All Hands or Permanent Assembly, but not whatever you want when you want.