# Marketing Meet.coop **URL:** https://forum.meet.coop/t/marketing-meet-coop/134 **Category:** Marketing **Tags:** prod, time-deliberating **Created:** [20 June 2020 09:21 UTC](https://forum.meet.coop/t/marketing-meet-coop/134 "2020-06-20T09:21:19Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 24
### Author: ![wouter](https://forum.meet.coop/user_avatar/forum.meet.coop/wouter/32/318_2.png) [@wouter](https://forum.meet.coop/u/wouter) #### Post date: [26 June 2020 11:20 UTC](https://forum.meet.coop/t/marketing-meet-coop/134/24 "2020-06-26T11:20:00Z")
We still need to agree on the [Service Levels](https://wiki.meet.coop/wiki/Service_levels). Chris made a great start in the wiki, which I adjusted to make it somewhat more in line with the ColloCall prices. But I read doubts at your part, let me cite from the Systems architecture thread: > [@Systems architecture](https://forum.meet.coop/t/systems-architecture/126/9): > > We can’t currently do this so I think we are going to have to set these variables high for almost all the containers as organisations are not going to generally want to have more than one container, in fact to start with (for the whole of the Alpha stage), we might not want to set any prices and simply charge different organisations based on their size, the type of organisation, wealth of the organisation, an estimate of possible usage and level of non-financial contribution from the organisation. We also need to be aware that if we want to raise funds for things like our own hardware we are going to need to bring in a lot of money. Now, I think people will want to know what they get before making any level of contribution. If we tell them “you need to pay between 20 and 200 a month, depending on to be defined and implemented usage statistics” they walk away. In fact, many are asking for such definition. Also the ColloCall prices and service level definitions are rather ok, isn’t it? --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.meet.coop/t/marketing-meet-coop/134)._